ARTICLES |
|
|
|
|
The Composition of the Personnel in the Astronomical Organization during the Early Years of the Northern Song Dynasty |
WANG Jichen |
Institute for the History of Natural Sciences, CAS, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS,Beijing 100049, China |
|
|
Abstract In the early years of the Northern Song Dynasty, the official astronomical institutions faced the serious situation of what was called "the scarcity of calculating experts." In order to organize a new team of astronomers, the imperial court recruited a large number of experts from amongst officials of the previous dynasty and new appointees from among the common people as Astronomical officials. However, from the late Tang and Five Dynasties, the families that produced these experts had been in decline and astronomical officials were rare, so their contribution to the development of astronomy in the early Song Dynasty was limited. Under these conditions, the imperial court recruited common people and appointed officials of special merit to fill the astronomical institutions. These people had different levels of astronomical knowledge, but their participation helped to relieve the shortage of talent. In addition, relying on the assimilation of experts from among the common people, the astronomical institutions in the early years of the Northern Song Dynasty were able to organize and absorb the astronomical knowledge scattered among the common folk in the late Tang, providing a foundation for the historical leap in the development of astronomy during the Song dynasty. This paper also provides a new research perspective to re-examine the relationship between folk astronomy and official astronomical institutions under the astronomical ban.
|
Received: 19 October 2018
Published: 21 June 2021
|
|
|
|
1 陈晓中. 中国古代天文机构与天文教育[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 2013. 16~248. 2 中国科学院北京天文台. 中国天文史料汇编[G]. 北京:科学出版社, 1989. 91~132. 3 赵贞. 唐宋天文星占与帝王政治[M]. 北京师范大学出版社, 2016. 400~428. 4 郭应彪. 唐宋翰林院天文官演变考[J]. 广西民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 4: 32~37. 5 苏湛. 北宋科学和技术活动参与者的构成[J]. 科学文化评论, 2016, 13(4): 38~57. 6 梁廷枏. 南汉书[M]. 广州: 广东人民出版社, 1981. 4. 7 宋祁. 冯侍讲行状[M]//宋文鉴. 北京: 中华书局, 1992. 1912. 8 脱脱, 等. 宋史[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1985. 9821. 9 郭棐. 广东通志 [M]. 明万历三十年刻本. 2772. 10 孙光宪. 北梦琐言[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2002. 389. 11 薛居正. 旧五代史[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1976. 1729. 12 黄休复. 益州名画录[M]. 卷上//影印文渊阁四库全书. 台北: 台湾商务印书馆, 1983. 13. 13 刘道醇. 宋朝名画评[M]. 卷1/影印文渊阁四库全书. 台北: 台湾商务印书馆, 1983. 16. 14 韦兵. 夷夏之辨与雅俗之分: 唐宋变革视野下的宋代儒家历、历家历之争[J]. 学术月刊, 2009, 6: 126~139. 15 范纯仁. 《王氏语录》序[M]//范文正公集//四部丛刊初编. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1919(民国8年). 687. 16 熊子臣. 万历《括苍汇纪》[M]. 卷15. 万历七年刻本. 513. 17 文莹. 玉壶清话[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1984. 6. 18 方龄贵. 通制条格校注[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2011. 604. 19 俞正燮. 长月直日解[M]//癸巳类稿(二). 沈阳: 辽宁教育出版社, 2001. 468~470. 20 太史文. 中国中世纪的鬼节[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2016. 21~32. 21 李焘. 续资治通鉴长编[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2004. 416, 1227. 22 宋会要辑稿[M]. 刘琳, 刁忠民, 舒大刚, 校点. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2014. 3081. 23 王明清. 挥麈录[M]. 王松清, 点校. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2012. 176. 24 王应麟. 玉海艺文校证[M]. 南京: 凤凰出版社, 2013. 968. 25 陈久金, 马肇曾. 回人马依泽对宋初天文学的贡献[J]. 中国科技史杂志, 1989, 10(2): 3~11. 26 陈寅恪. 四声三问[M]//金明馆丛稿初编. 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2001. 367~381. 27 罗常培. 汉语音韵学的外来影响[C]//罗常培语言学论文集. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2004. 359. 28 郑樵. 通志二十略[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1995. 1516. 29 马肇曾. 《怀宁马氏宗谱》及历代主要人物考(上)[J]. 回族研究, 1998, 4: 129~137. 30 陈美东. 中国科学技术史·天文学卷[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003. 435~438. 31 杨晓红. 宋代占卜与宋代社会[J]. 四川师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2002, 29(3): 94~99. 32 荣新江. 中古中国与外来文明[M]. 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2014. 210~228. 33 Mark B M. Yusi Jing: A Treatise of "Western" Astral Science in Chinese and Its Versified Version Xitian yusi jing[J]. SCIAMVS, 2014,(15): 105~169. 34 钮卫星. 敦煌遗书开宝七年星命书(P. 4071)中的十一曜行度及相关问题研究[J]. 自然科学史研究, 2015, 34(4): 411~424. 35 钮卫星. 《梵天火罗九曜》考释及其撰写年代和作者问题探讨[J]. 自然科学史研究, 2005, 24(4): 319~329. 36 沈括. 梦溪笔谈[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2005. 72 37 胡静宜. 试论宋代频繁改历的原因[J]. 学术月刊, 1997,(4): 98~104.
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|